- Home
- Tutorial
- Resource Guides
- Focus Areas
- LSF Programs
-
Professional
Development - Review Process
-
A project of LSF
This resource engages students in inquiry-based learning focused on digital citizenship, disinformation/ misinformation, and scientific thinking. Through interactive activities, students learn to distinguish fact from opinion, evaluate the credibility of media, and apply critical thinking skills to identify misinformation and science denial. The lesson culminates in a task that allows students to demonstrate their understanding.
Students will:
The lesson promotes responsible digital citizenship and evidence-based reasoning while encouraging students to reflect on their own information consumption habits. Extension opportunities are included to deepen student understanding of misinformation in digital spaces.
The following tool will allow you to explore the relevant curriculum matches for this resource. To start, select a province listed below.
| Principle | Rating | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Consideration of Alternative Perspectives | Very Good | Students are equipped with practical digital literacy skills that help them critically evaluate online information, participate responsibly in the digital world, and consider different points of view. |
Consideration of Alternative Perspectives:
| ||
| Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions | Poor/Not considered | Although not explicitly addressed in the lesson, there is potential to explore the interconnected impacts of misinformation and disinformation across these dimensions. |
| Multiple Dimensions of Problems & Solutions: Effectively addresses the environmental, economic and social dimensions of the issue(s) being explored.
| ||
| Respects Complexity | Very Good | This lesson teaches students to distinguish fact from opinion, evaluate the credibility of media, and apply critical thinking skills to identify misinformation and science denial. It equips student with the necessary skills to evaluate visual, text and social media for validity. |
| Respects Complexity: The complexity of the problems/issues being discussed is respected. | ||
| Acting on Learning | Good | The resource includes an opportunity for students to create an illustrated poster that communicates a strategy for identifying misinformation. Students share their learning by selecting a location to display their poster, supporting peer education and awareness within the school community. |
| Acting on Learning: Learning moves from understanding issues to working towards positive change — in personal lifestyle, in school, in the community, or for the planet
| ||
| Values Education | Good | Opportunities are provided to allow students to discuss the information presented and express their understanding of the issues. |
| Values Education: Students are explicitly provided with opportunities to identify, clarify and express their own beliefs/values. | ||
| Empathy & Respect for Humans | Poor/Not considered | Not considered in this resource |
| Empathy & Respect for Humans: Empathy and respect are fostered for diverse groups of humans (including different genders, ethnic groups, sexual preferences, etc.). | ||
| Personal Affinity with Earth | Poor/Not considered | Not considered in this resource |
| Personal Affinity with Earth: Encourages a personal affinity with -the natural world.
| ||
| Locally-Focused Learning | Good | Students develop the skills to critically, effectively, and responsibly access, understand, and engage with information in the news and on social media. |
| Locally-Focused Learning: Includes learning experiences that take advantage of issues/elements within the local community.
| ||
| Past, Present & Future | Satisfactory | The lesson suggests that traditional news sources have declined over time while social media has become a main source of information. This change is linked to current and future concerns about misinformation and its impact on an informed population. |
| Past, Present & Future: Promotes an understanding of the past, a sense of the present, and a positive vision for the future. | ||
| Principle | Rating | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Open-Ended Instruction | Good | Students explore a range of strategies for evaluating online information and apply these skills through guided activities that focus on identifying misinformation and assessing the credibility of media sources. They demonstrate their understanding by creating a poster that communicates one of the strategies learned. |
| Open-Ended Instruction
: Lessons are structured so that multiple/complex answers are possible; students are not steered toward one 'right' answer. | ||
| Integrated Learning | Good |
|
| Integrated Learning: Learning brings together content and skills from more than one subject area
| ||
| Inquiry Learning | Good | This resource uses an inquiry-based approach where students learn by exploring, questioning and applying strategies to real examples of media and online information. Students actively investigate the credibility of sources and the presence of misinformation, using guided tools and criteria to support their thinking. Through discussion, analysis, and a culminating task, they construct their own understanding and demonstrate their learning by applying critical thinking skills. |
| Inquiry Learning: Learning is directed by questions, problems, or challenges that students work to address.
| ||
| Differentiated Instruction | Very Good | The resource provides a suggested list of differentiated strategies so teachers can tailor the instruction to students’ needs based on their readiness, interests and learning styles. |
| Differentiated Instruction: Activities address a range of student learning styles, abilities and readiness.
| ||
| Experiential Learning | Good | The resource provides an authentic learning experience by teaching students critical thinking skills to identify misinformation in real-world media and online contexts. They learn strategies to evaluate visual, text and social media for validity, misinformation and disinformation. |
| Experiential Learning: Authentic learning experiences are provided
| ||
| Cooperative Learning | Satisfactory | Students work in groups. |
| Cooperative Learning: Group and cooperative learning strategies are a priority.
| ||
| Assessment & Evaluation | Good | Assessment strategies include teacher observation during discussions, ongoing assessment as students apply evaluation strategies to media, class discussions, illustrated poster depicting a misinformation strategy and student reflection. |
| Assessment & Evaluation: Tools are provided that help students and teachers to capture formative and summative information about students' learning and performance. These tools may include reflection questions, checklists, rubrics, etc. | ||
| Peer Teaching | Satisfactory | The resource suggest as a next step to create a digital collection of the posters to use in other classes or with parents. |
| Peer Teaching: Provides opportunities for students to actively present their knowledge and skills to peers and/or act as teachers and mentors.
| ||
| Case Studies | Poor/Not considered | Not considered in this resource. |
| Case Studies: Relevant case studies are included. Case studies are thorough descriptions of real events from real situations that students use to explore concepts in an authentic context. | ||
| Locus of Control | Satisfactory | Students have options for creating their posters. They are encouraged to uses images and brief words while conveying their message. |
| Locus of Control: Meaningful opportunities are provided for students to choose elements of program content, the medium in which they wish to work, and/or to go deeper into a chosen issue. | ||